So Wajid Khan has accepted Prime Minister Harper's appointment for him to become his Special advisor to the Middle East. But Mr. Khan just so happens to be the Liberal Defence Critic. Advising the Conservative government on how to deal with the Middle East conflict - a small conflict of interest? I think so.
My question is directed to Mr. Khan: Why would you set aside your responsibilities as a Liberal and succumb to Mr. Harper’s so obvious game of political manipulation?
It is not a wise move on his part because, even though he is a Liberal and always will be, it is difficult for him to remain part of Liberal discussions when he is reporting directly to the Conservative leader. I agree with many of the criticisms he has been receiving because it is quite obvious that Mr. Harper is trying to use the idea of non-partisanship to increase numbers in the polls. He has done it with David Emerson, with Michael Fortier etc. At a time when Liberals are coming closer to the Conservatives in the polls, and when the Leadership convention is coming up not to far off, it makes me a little uneasy to know that a Liberal is assisting, I think is a fair choice of words, the Conservatives in their plot against the Liberals.
For the time being should Mr. Khan be “banned” from caucus discussions while he is reporting to the PM? I would think yes, as it is a clear conflict of interest to be working both sides (even though he is giving up his spot as defence critic, he is still a Liberal) with the same degree of dedication and commitment to the Party; but who says I am right ?
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment